Ricks认为过渡计划的成本效益可能促成永久性覆盖,最好纳入Part D。
但我认为所有信号都指向相当成功的成本效益,这可能带来立法或监管层面的永久性覆盖转变。同时,CMS负责人目前有很大动力继续推进,正确的方式是将其纳入Part D福利。原文 (en)
But I think all signals now point to a pretty successful cost effectiveness which could yield either a legislative or a regulatory shift in the coverage permanently. In the meantime, I think there is a lot of energy with the people running CMS at current point to continue this, and the right way to do that is put this into the Part D benefit.